Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Geoffrey Deihl's avatar

Degrowth originated in 1972, but didn't get much traction outside of Europe for decades. Your professors must have been pretty "tuned in!" I was unaware of it myself until a couple of years ago, but it resonated with what should be obvious, the Earth is finite. It also connects wealth disparity all around us, abuse of the global south and the environmental crisis we're in. The word degrowth itself has a negative vibe. Some have suggested "post-growth." I agree with you, it needs to be properly communicated, intellectual, scientific discourse isn't persuasive for most. Now time is a huge problem, indeed, 45 years wasted. I will likely come back to the subject again. I did a bit, at the end of the article below, imagining a bit of a degrowth life. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

https://geoffreydeihl.substack.com/p/the-illusions-of-fossil-fuels

Expand full comment
Geoffrey Deihl's avatar

Betsy, those who deny reality, or simply don't have a clue of the problem we face will find my writing depressing, or dismiss it from fear. People calling out the system for its destructiveness face the challenge of persuading minds. Some may be generally liberal people that aren't getting the truth from mainstream news sources. Some may be hard deniers, who can be enlightened. Occasionally, even a few Nazis and KKK members wake up. The "New Green Deal" falls far short of course, further tearing up the planet and contributing to the 6th mass extinction. Reduction of consumption must be a topic. "Stuff" is a trap, hardly a new thought, but certainly one we have to embrace. It comes down to changing culture and improving education, but we're out of time for those goals, and we have enormous power that wishes to maintain the status quo. You are welcome to share this post or any of my writing if it's helpful. I just want to contribute to the greater good. Thank you.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts